|
your Soviet Union analogy is off I think. You're taking a small point and taking it to an absolute EXTREME. I could do the same with capitalism but that would be futile.
Many countries use the concept of universality in delivering the services it decides, democratically, to provide for it's citizens, ALL it's citizens.
In the US, garbage collection follows this concept...each house gets two cans picked for free each week, doesn't it??? It does not matter how rich or poor you are the service is provided to all on the same level. If the service gets to be too expensive, a politician might run on a platform of cutting back the service and when elected BY THE PEOPLE he may very well cut the service back some. The people have decided. What's wrong with that.
Universality does two things: It eliminates the need for an expensive bureaucracy dedicated to policing who qualifies for this or that and it eliminates the argument (that I read on this board ad nauseam) that hard working people are paying for lazy people.
I'm not sure that the connection you try to make between unemployment and universality is valid. All I know is that there are a whole bunch of countries that, to varying degrees, run their social programs like that. But in those countries the population is not afraid of a little "grey"...I fully understand that to you EVERYTHING is stricly black and white and there can't be ANYTHING in between so I'm not trying to convince you to switch...just trying to inform you on how some other countries operate.
Just because people in other countries do some things differently is no a "threat" Jay...don't have to get upset, especially since your staying home anyway
|